The
Myth of the
'Crack Baby'
Doctors and the media were wrong in thinking we'd
never succeed.
Some
of us went into foster care because our mothers used crack while
they were pregnant with us. We were what the television and newspapers
called "crack babies." They labeled those of us exposed
to crack in the womb as a new "biological underclass"
and a "lost generation."
Throughout
the late 1980s and early 1990s, images of tiny, herky-jerky infants
with cat-like cries flooded television screens. Newspapers believed
that these "crack babies" would never be able to learn
much or take care of themselves. In 1989, one psychologist who
specialized in drugs claimed that exposing unborn babies to cocaine
"was interfering with the central core of what it is to be
human."
Scientists
Catch On
A
newspaper columnist, Charles Krauthammer, wrote that kids born
with drugs in their bodies were babies "whose future is closed
to them from day one. Theirs will be a life of certain suffering,
of probable deviance, of permanent inferiority
And all of
this is biologically determined from birth."
Well,
many teens who were once called "crack babies" are now
all grown up and-surprise, surprise-we can do all the things they
believed we wouldn't be able to do. We can read and write, we
can love and take care of ourselves, we can go to college and
work.
So
it should come as no big shock that science has finally caught
on to that fact. Being exposed to crack in the womb, studies have
found, isn't as big a deal as everyone once said it was. In fact,
it can be more damaging for a baby to be born prematurely, or
for a mother to drink alcohol, or not get prenatal care for her
baby.
Dr.
Deborah Frank, associate professor of pediatrics at Boston University
School of Medicine, says there is little evidence that exposure
to crack in the womb affects kids in the long run. "Based
on years of careful research," she said, "we conclude
the crack baby is a grotesque media stereotype, not a scientific
diagnosis."
The
Media's Frightening Story
Frank
does say that some kids born exposed to crack may have something
similar to attention-deficit disorder (ADD), which means they
have trouble focusing for long periods of time. But for the most
part, they don't have long-term problems, especially if they end
up in a nurturing, healthy environment. Frank adds that a child's
exposure to violence after birth has more of an impact on a child's
behavior or IQ than prenatal exposure to cocaine.
So
where did the TV get those so-called "crack babies"
that seemed to be so sickly? As it turns out, most of those scrawny
infants on TV hadn't received prenatal care. Often as a result,
they were born premature. So when the TV showed pictures of "crack
babies," it was often showing what it looked like to be born
premature, not what it looked like to be born with drugs. And
it was such a frightening story that the American public ate it
up.
The
Stereotype Still Hurts
Now
we know that being born exposed to cocaine doesn't ruin a kid's
life, but some of us who grew up with that label believed that
we wouldn't amount to anything. Some of us got teased or taunted
because of it. We deserve an apology.
And
most people still don't know that those of us called crack babies
are leading regular lives, and in many cases, having a positive
impact on the world around us. (When the first "crack babies"
hit their teens in the late-1990s, crime, youth violence, teen
pregnancy and drug use began dropping dramatically.)
Until
the public learns about the lie of the "crack baby,"
kids whose mothers used drugs while they were pregnant will continue
to suffer, from the stereotype. The term, "crack baby"
says Frank, "should be no more acceptable
than the N
word."
-Adapted
from an article by Maia Szalavitz in the March/April 2004 issue
of City Limits.